Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the potential outcomes of an election, which is a significant public issue. It presents an opinion on the likely winner, indicating a preference for one candidate over another.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions, as it simply expresses an opinion on the election outcome.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is focused on expressing a personal belief about the election outcome without further context or reasoning.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, as it focuses on the election outcome rather than attacking individuals. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech by expressing an opinion on a public issue, but it lacks substantial reasoning or evidence to support the claim, which could enhance the responsible use of the platform. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.