Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
Middle East Eye
@MiddleEastEye
·
269d
The statement critiques the perceived inconsistency in public reactions to political figures and campaign funding, suggesting a bias in how different situations are judged. It highlights a specific issue related to campaign finance and political integrity, thus engaging in public discourse.
- The statement does not directly harm others but implies criticism of those who are silent about certain issues, which could be seen as indirectly harmful. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does call out perceived hypocrisy.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on criticism. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, maintaining a focus on the issue rather than individuals. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to highlight a perceived inconsistency in political discourse, which could contribute to societal betterment by encouraging scrutiny of political funding. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to raise awareness about a public issue, maintaining integrity in its critique. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.