Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement is a critique of political strategies and media narratives, focusing on the potential scapegoating of Dr. Jill Stein by Democrats and media in the event of a Harris loss. It addresses public issues such as political accountability and media influence, thus constituting public discourse.
- The statement uses charged language like 'attacks & smears' and 'blame,' which could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but the accusatory tone could be seen as disrespectful to those it criticizes. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on blame and criticism without offering constructive solutions. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it uses accusatory language and does not invite discussion or understanding from opposing viewpoints. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement attempts to use influence to highlight perceived political failures, which could be seen as aiming for societal betterment, but it does so in a divisive manner.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so with a tone that may not uphold responsibility and integrity, as it could contribute to polarization. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.