Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement involves a public figure, Joe Rogan, endorsing a political candidate, Donald Trump, for president. This constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue, namely the presidential election, and contributes to civic dialogue by expressing a political opinion.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but endorsements can influence public opinion significantly.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is a straightforward endorsement without elaboration.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, nor does it involve personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to endorse a political candidate, which can be seen as contributing to public discourse, though the betterment of society is subjective and depends on one's political views. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to express a political opinion, which is a responsible use of free speech rights. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.