Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement expresses a critical view of American politics, suggesting that the system is intentionally designed to disadvantage certain groups. It uses strong language to convey a sense of frustration and urgency about societal issues, potentially aiming to provoke thought or action.
- The statement uses strong language that could be perceived as harmful or inflammatory, potentially inciting anger or division rather than constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but the tone could be seen as dismissive of differing perspectives.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on criticism without offering solutions or fostering dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks, but it lacks constructive criticism and dialogue, focusing instead on a broad critique of the system. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement attempts to use influence to highlight perceived systemic issues, but it does so in a way that may not contribute positively to societal betterment. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech but may not use the platform responsibly, as it could contribute to polarization without fostering constructive discourse. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.