The statement raises concerns about the potential abuse of power by authorities, using the example of a viral incident involving a squirrel and raccoon. It suggests that such actions could have broader implications, such as the loss of a rescue farm, and encourages reflection on these issues during an election. The tone is cautionary and aims to provoke thought about the consequences of governmental actions.
- The statement does not directly harm others but raises awareness about potential misuse of power, aligning with the principle. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, focusing on public actions of authorities rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by highlighting potential consequences of authority actions, fostering empathy for those affected. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but rather critiques actions of authorities, aligning with constructive dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its influence to raise awareness about potential societal issues, aiming for the betterment of society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by responsibly discussing public concerns about authority actions. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.