Jill Stien

The statement is accusatory and critical of the Biden-Harris administration, alleging their responsibility for funding a genocide. It engages in public discourse by addressing political accountability and policy implications, particularly in the context of U.S. foreign policy. The tone is confrontational and seeks to challenge the narrative of the opposing political side.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement uses strong language that could be seen as harmful, as it accuses the administration of funding genocide without providing evidence, potentially inciting fear or anger. [-2]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but the accusatory tone could be seen as disrespectful to those involved. [-1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on blame rather than constructive dialogue. [-2]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it makes a serious accusation without evidence, which could be seen as a personal attack on the administration. [-2]
5. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement uses influence to raise awareness of an issue, but the accusatory tone may not contribute positively to societal betterment. [-1]
6. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement exercises free speech but may not use the platform responsibly, as it makes serious accusations without substantiation. [-1]