The statement by Jill Stein constitutes public discourse as it addresses a significant public issue related to U.S. military policy and foreign relations. The statement suggests a policy change regarding the presence of U.S. military bases overseas, which is a matter of public concern and debate.
- The statement does not directly cause harm with words or actions, but it proposes a significant policy change that could have wide-ranging implications. It neither aligns nor violates this principle.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by clearly stating a policy position, but it does not explicitly promote empathy or compassion. It is neutral in this regard.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It presents a policy position without targeting individuals, aligning with this principle. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to propose a policy change that the speaker believes would benefit society, aligning with this principle. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by responsibly using a platform to discuss a public issue, aligning with this principle. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.