The statement highlights a university's approach to helping students cope with election-related stress, using a somewhat sarcastic tone to question the seriousness of the measures. It touches on public discourse by addressing how educational institutions handle political stress among students.
- The statement uses a sarcastic tone that could be seen as dismissive, potentially causing harm by belittling the efforts of the institution and the students' feelings. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but the sarcastic tone could be seen as undermining the dignity of those involved. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it uses sarcasm rather than a constructive approach to discuss the issue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, instead opting for a sarcastic tone that could be perceived as a personal attack on the institution's methods. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses free speech to critique a public issue, but the sarcastic tone may not align with responsible use of the platform.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.