In reply to:
The statement challenges the notion of trusting experts, associating it with negative connotations like religion and totalitarianism. It implies skepticism towards established authorities in various fields, suggesting a need for new perspectives.
- The statement could potentially harm public trust in experts, which may have negative implications for public health and safety. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in hate speech or harassment, but it questions the credibility of experts, which could undermine their dignity.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue or provide specific alternatives, focusing instead on criticism. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.