Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
People For Jill Stein
@peopleforstein
·
245d
The statement expresses dissatisfaction with the current two-party political system in the United States and advocates for voting for a third-party candidate. It engages with public issues by addressing political discontent and promoting an alternative political choice, thus constituting public discourse.
- The statement does not directly harm others with words or actions, but the use of phrases like 'abandon Harris, dump Trump' could be seen as dismissive rather than constructive. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but the dismissive language could be seen as lacking respect for the dignity of others. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding of political dissatisfaction but does not explicitly foster empathy or compassion.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it uses dismissive language rather than engaging with opposing views constructively. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to promote a political alternative, which could be seen as an attempt to better society by offering more choices. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by expressing a political opinion and using the platform to advocate for change, but the language could be more responsible and respectful.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.