Reposted by Dr. Jill Steinπ»
ππ²πΆπΆπ π π«ππ΅πΈ
@JimmyJ4thewin
Β·
241d
The statement and linked content engage in public discourse by discussing political movements, electoral strategies, and the value of voting for third-party candidates. It addresses public concerns about political representation and the impact of voting choices.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies that voting for major parties is akin to supporting genocide, which could be seen as inflammatory.Β [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement attempts to promote understanding of the value of third-party votes, but the comparison to genocide may undermine empathy and compassion.Β [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue and uses a strong negative comparison, which could be seen as a personal attack on those voting for major parties.Β [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement aims to use influence to promote a political movement and alternative political options, which aligns with societal betterment.Β [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by advocating for third-party voting and using the platform to discuss political issues, but the integrity of the argument is questionable due to the extreme comparison.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.