Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement by Jill Stein addresses a public issue, specifically the implementation of a weapons embargo and its potential political implications for Kamala Harris. It suggests that Harris prioritizes electoral outcomes over humanitarian concerns, which is a serious accusation related to public policy and governance.
- The statement implies harm by accusing Kamala Harris of prioritizing electoral loss over ending genocide, which could be seen as harmful rhetoric. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but it does make a serious accusation that could affect Harris's dignity. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on a negative portrayal of Harris's intentions. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it makes a personal attack on Harris's character and intentions. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to criticize a public figure, but it does not clearly aim for societal betterment, as it lacks constructive suggestions or solutions. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that could be seen as lacking responsibility and integrity due to its accusatory nature. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.