Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement reports on a serious and tragic event involving a bombing in Lebanon, attributing responsibility to political figures. It uses strong language, such as 'massacre,' which indicates a critical tone and intent to provoke a reaction. The statement could contribute to public discourse by addressing international relations and military actions.
- The statement uses charged language that could incite anger or fear, potentially causing harm. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but it could be seen as inflammatory. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it focuses on assigning blame. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it makes a strong accusation without evidence. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to highlight a significant issue, but the approach may not contribute positively to societal betterment. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech but may not do so responsibly, given the lack of evidence and potential for incitement. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.