Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement appears to be a report or inquiry about a potential policy direction of the US administration regarding Iran, which is a public issue. It involves a question about the 'maximum pressure' policy, indicating engagement with foreign policy matters.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is a straightforward inquiry about policy.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- There is no indication of disrespecting privacy or dignity, nor is there any cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does seek information that could contribute to public understanding of policy directions.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement is a question posed to a public figure, which is a form of constructive dialogue. There are no personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to inquire about public policy responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.