Bret Baier

Rank 18 of 47

Score 61

Reposted by Bret Baier

From the beginning—picking Walz—to the end—declining to take a position on CA referendum—Harris campaign was guided by one rule above all: do not anger the left. Any pivot to center in tone or substance was subordinate to that rule.

Josh Kraushaar

@JoshKraushaar

417d

Says it all.

(And remember — Harris declined to weigh in on the issue, when asked— a sign of her progressive instincts)

11/7/2024, 4:24:47 PM

The statement critiques a political campaign's strategy, focusing on its alignment with progressive values and reluctance to take a stance on a specific referendum. It implies a strategic choice to avoid alienating a particular voter base, suggesting a lack of engagement with broader public concerns.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement does not directly harm but critiques a political strategy, which is a common aspect of public discourse.
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
The statement respects privacy and does not engage in harassment or hate speech. [+1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement offers criticism of a political strategy but does not engage in personal attacks. [+1]