Matt Taibbi

Rank 24 of 47
|
Score 7
11/8/2024, 8:47:38 PM
X
In reply to:
Coming 4 ya
@coming4youuu2
·
411d
@mtaibbi Your repost let me see just how wild, fake, manufactured chaos this application has become. Utterly insane. Elon takes billions in corp handouts for his dildo cars, buys X, uses you like a skank for Twitter Files and you make so much money now, you could care less.
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
411d
@coming4youuu2 Free, yes. Also anonymous. Tell us your real name.
Coming 4 ya
@coming4youuu2
·
411d
@mtaibbi Free Speech, am I right?
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
411d
Tell me your real name and address and talk about my kids again.
Coming 4 ya
@coming4youuu2
·
411d
@mtaibbi really are a pissant now. Balding incel w yellow fever, never laid until a desperate Asian female settled. Your kids will be weak, like Rufo’s. You are weak. Why do the weirdos like you and Rufo always have some weird Asian wife that settled? White women prolly always hated you

The statement 'What’s your name?' by @coming4youuu2 is a part of a heated exchange involving personal attacks and derogatory remarks. The conversation involves public figures and touches on issues of free speech and personal privacy, thus constituting public discourse. However, the tone is confrontational and disrespectful, focusing on personal attacks rather than constructive dialogue.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement and the surrounding conversation violate the principle of doing no harm with words, as they include derogatory and harmful language. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The conversation violates the principle of respecting privacy and dignity, engaging in personal attacks and potentially cyberbullying. [-2]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The exchange lacks constructive criticism and dialogue, focusing instead on personal attacks and ad hominem arguments. [-2]