The statement questions the credibility and efficiency of the vote counting system in Arizona, suggesting it is an embarrassment due to delays in counting ballots. It seeks credible sources for information on outstanding votes, indicating a concern for transparency and accuracy in the electoral process.
- The statement does not directly harm others but could contribute to undermining trust in the electoral process if not substantiated with facts. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but criticizes the vote counting system, which could be seen as constructive if it leads to improvements. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses free speech to question a public process, which is responsible if it encourages accountability and transparency. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.