The statement engages in public discourse by addressing issues related to political comebacks, censorship, and the U.S. Constitution, which are significant public concerns. It presents an opinion on the role of government and technology in censorship and references a plan to combat it.
- The statement does not directly harm others with words or actions, but it could be seen as polarizing, which may indirectly contribute to divisiveness.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, and respects the privacy and dignity of others. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is more focused on political opinion and critique.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, but it lacks constructive dialogue with those who might disagree.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to address societal issues, specifically censorship, which can be seen as an attempt to better society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by discussing censorship and advocating for a plan to combat it, using the platform to express political views responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.