Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
Jamie Kranich 🌵🏜️
@jamie_kranich
·
8d
The statement highlights a discrepancy in the number of votes received by Green Party candidates in Arizona, suggesting an unusual voting pattern. It raises questions about the electoral process and results, which are relevant to public discourse.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies a need for scrutiny, which can be constructive if approached responsibly. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, focusing on public figures and election results. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement invites dialogue and scrutiny, which can be constructive if it avoids personal attacks and focuses on facts. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.