Peter Diamandis

Rank 8 of 47
|
Score 138

The statement critiques the business models of CNN and the Washington Post, suggesting they focus on delivering negative news to attract viewers and advertisers. It implies a broader commentary on media practices and their impact on public perception.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly harm with words or actions, but it implies criticism of media practices without specific harmful language.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does critique organizations rather than individuals.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on criticism rather than constructive dialogue. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism of media practices but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to critique media practices, which could be seen as an attempt to better inform the public about media consumption. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech by critiquing media practices, but it should ensure accuracy and responsibility in its claims. [+1]