Jill Stien

Rank 28 of 47
|
Score 16

The statement suggests a critique of the influence of AIPAC and Israel on US elections, implying a significant impact on the political landscape. It raises concerns about foreign influence and campaign financing, which are public issues.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement could be seen as potentially harmful by implying a negative influence of a specific group, which may contribute to divisive rhetoric. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement risks disrespecting the dignity of individuals associated with AIPAC or those identified as Zionists, potentially leading to harassment or hate speech. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it frames the issue in a potentially inflammatory manner. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it makes a broad assertion without inviting discussion or providing evidence. [-1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to raise awareness of a perceived issue, but it does so in a way that may not contribute positively to societal discourse. [-1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech but may not do so responsibly, as it could incite negative sentiments without fostering informed debate. [-1]