The statement and image engage in public discourse by critiquing media and intellectual responses to political events. The tone is provocative and critical, using strong language and imagery to convey disdain for certain media narratives and voter perceptions.
- The statement uses harsh language that could be considered harmful, particularly towards media and rural voters. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement and image could be seen as disrespectful, potentially engaging in derogatory labeling of groups. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, instead using divisive language. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue, opting for personal attacks and generalizations. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.