Matt Taibbi

Rank 24 of 47

Score 7

There’s been no allegation - not one - that any of the Twitter Files documents were inauthentic. There’d be no reason to suspect this, either, since the company was the source.

🔞 Space-faring, glowing goo

@Coren26994826

409d

@DicksonDawg @zorntbh @BerryBlue97 @Nate71820994528 @Mock43754040 @ScottBennett84 @RonFilipkowski @mtaibbi If you had actually STUDIED the words you are using rn, you'd know that primary sources need to be taken together and aren't reliable by themselves

Yk, because a thing called "LYING" Exists, and also a thing called "BEING WRONG" does

11/11/2024, 4:16:33 PM

The statement addresses the authenticity of the Twitter Files documents, which is a public issue related to transparency and information reliability. It aims to clarify misconceptions about the documents' authenticity, engaging in a broader discussion about media and source credibility.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement does not directly cause harm but is part of a heated exchange that includes derogatory language in the broader conversation.
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
The statement itself respects privacy and dignity, but the surrounding conversation includes disrespectful language.
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
The statement attempts to clarify a misunderstanding, which can promote understanding, but the tone of the broader conversation is not empathetic.
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement is part of a dialogue but does not engage in personal attacks itself, though the broader conversation does include such attacks.