Michael Talbot
@MichaelJTalbot
·
409d
The statement engages in public discourse by questioning the integrity and motivations of a writer's past work related to a significant political issue, 'Russiagate.' It implies a critique of media narratives and journalistic integrity.
- The statement questions the integrity of a writer, which could be seen as harmful if not substantiated, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of the writer by accusing them of selling out, which could be considered a personal attack. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism, as it focuses on personal attacks rather than substantive dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.