Matt Taibbi

Rank 23 of 47

Score 18

“Liberalism may not be the monstrous, all-powerful conspiracy that conservatives make it out to be, but its failings are clear nonetheless. Somewhere in the last four decades liberalism ceased to be relevant to huge portions of its traditional constituency…”

11/11/2024, 7:26:56 PM

In reply to:

Matt Taibbi

@mtaibbi

409d

That’s not on Tom. Reviewers only read and highlighted the parts that validated the idea that Republicans are irrational and unreachable. At the end he brutally excoriated Democrats and predicted future failures:

Brad Pearce

@WaywardRabbler

409d

@mtaibbi I never read the book but seem to remember the takeaway from the discourse on "What's the Matter With Kansas" is that Middle America "votes against their own interests" out of hatred and evil and it was a key point in the elites deciding they didn't have to care.

The statement critiques liberalism's relevance to its traditional base, engaging in a broader discussion about political ideologies and their impact on society. It reflects on the perceived shortcomings of liberalism over the past decades, contributing to a public discourse on political alignment and voter behavior.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement does not use harmful language or actions, maintaining a critical yet respectful tone. [+1]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
The statement attempts to promote understanding by analyzing the perceived failings of liberalism, though it could be more empathetic towards differing viewpoints. [+1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in constructive criticism of liberalism without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]