Matt Taibbi

The statement critiques the efforts of agencies promoting 'informational hygiene' and suggests that the public is skeptical of these efforts. It implies a disconnect between the intentions of these agencies and public perception. The conversation touches on themes of misinformation, public trust, and political discourse.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not directly harm but questions the effectiveness of certain informational strategies.
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   It respects privacy but challenges the dignity of those promoting 'informational hygiene' by implying they are out of touch. [-1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement promotes understanding by highlighting public skepticism, but it could be more empathetic towards those it critiques.
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   It engages in constructive criticism by questioning the assumptions of those promoting 'informational hygiene' without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]