Preferred Reader 📖🇺🇸
@patty_medic
·
433d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the actions and words of a political figure, which is a public issue. It suggests a focus on the actions of an administration rather than the rhetoric of its leader, which is a substantive engagement with public concerns.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but downplays the impact of harmful rhetoric, which can indirectly cause harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it dismisses the importance of harmful speech.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion as it dismisses the significance of harmful words. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, but it lacks constructive criticism by not addressing the impact of harmful rhetoric.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.