The statement is part of a broader discussion on the credibility of investigations into Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. election, specifically questioning the thoroughness of the Senate report. It challenges the investigative practices and credibility of the report by highlighting the lack of direct interviews with key individuals. The tone is critical and somewhat sarcastic, aiming to question the validity of the Senate's conclusions.
- The statement does not directly harm others but questions the credibility of a public report.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does challenge the credibility of public figures and reports.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is more focused on critiquing the investigative process. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of the Senate report but does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech by questioning public reports and using the platform to express a critical viewpoint. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.