Matt Taibbi

Rank 22 of 47
|
Score 18
11/12/2024, 8:41:00 PM
X
In reply to:
JP Sand
@JPSand5
·
411d
@mtaibbi 🧐Matt, it appears that 'likes' are disappearing from your posts. I 'liked' several of your comments earlier today and my 'likes' were gone 2 hours later. Same yesterday.
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
411d
How about the fact that neither Harris nor Walz understands the First Amendment? That Harris was on record saying platforms needed responsibility “placed on” them, that she would empower the DOJ to hold platforms “accountable” for “hate” and “misinformation”?
Myopic Matt
@Trumpshanz
·
411d
@mtaibbi @walterkirn Matt, have you written anything on why Trump is "better" for speech than Kamala?

The statement 'Because I’m deamplified on this platform' is part of a broader conversation about free speech, platform responsibility, and potential censorship, which are public issues. The tone suggests a complaint about perceived censorship or reduced visibility on the platform.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly harm others but implies a grievance about platform treatment.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in harassment or hate speech.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is more focused on a personal grievance. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it is a personal complaint without addressing the broader issue constructively. [-1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement touches on free speech concerns but does not substantively engage with the issue or use the platform to promote a responsible dialogue. [-1]