The statement questions the use of the term 'presumptive' in the context of a reported case of avian influenza, suggesting that conclusions should be drawn only when the case is proven. This engages with public discourse by addressing the issue of how health information is communicated to the public.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but suggests caution in communication, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, as it does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by questioning the accuracy of information, encouraging critical thinking. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, focusing instead on the issue of communication. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech by responsibly questioning the language used in public health communication. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.