The statement is part of a public discourse on the topic of long COVID and vaccine injuries, engaging in a broader debate about public health and misinformation.
- The statement uses the term 'lemming' in a derogatory manner, which could be seen as harmful and dismissive, violating the principle of doing no harm with words. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The use of 'lemming' could be considered disrespectful, potentially bordering on harassment, as it dismisses the other person's viewpoint without engaging constructively. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it dismisses the other person's challenge without providing substantive engagement or evidence. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement fails to engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, instead resorting to a personal attack by calling the other person a 'lemming.' [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not acknowledge or correct any mistakes, but this principle is not directly relevant here.Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement does not use influence for societal betterment, but this principle is not directly relevant here.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement does not uphold free speech principles responsibly, as it dismisses opposing views without constructive engagement.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.