Matt Taibbi

Rank 22 of 47
|
Score 18

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the role of government agencies and political parties in influencing speech, referencing the 'Twitter Files' and the involvement of the FBI/DHS/GEC. It critiques the actions of these agencies and the political dynamics involved, contributing to a broader debate on free speech and government intervention.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly harm others with words or actions, but it does engage in a contentious topic.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does attribute actions to specific political groups, which could be seen as accusatory.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on assigning blame rather than fostering dialogue. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks but does not facilitate constructive dialogue either, as it is more accusatory in nature. [-1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech by discussing government interference in speech, but the tone could be more responsible and balanced. [+1]