The statement 'On the other hand, you suck' is a direct response to a public figure's comment on a significant public issue, namely the nomination of Tulsi Gabbard to lead the DNI. This constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public debate about a political nomination.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm; it is dismissive and derogatory. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of others and can be seen as a form of harassment or personal attack. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it is a personal attack rather than a reasoned argument. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.