Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement discusses political figures and their alleged intentions to dismantle the 'deep state,' which is a public issue related to governance and political strategy. The tone is sensational and potentially inflammatory, suggesting a critical view of the actions and intentions of these figures.
- The statement uses charged language like 'wrecking balls,' which could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm with words. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but the use of sensational language could indirectly affect the dignity of those mentioned. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on a negative portrayal without offering constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, instead using a sensational tone that could be seen as a personal attack on the figures mentioned. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses free speech to discuss public figures and issues, but the sensational tone may not align with responsible use of a platform. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.