The statement raises concerns about the integrity and transparency of election polling and media coverage, suggesting that accurate polls were suppressed. It implies a critique of Wikipedia and the New York Times, questioning their roles in presenting election data.
- The statement suggests harm by implying suppression of accurate information, which could undermine trust in media and institutions. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It questions the actions of Wikipedia and the New York Times, potentially affecting their reputations, but does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement critiques media practices but does not engage in personal attacks, focusing instead on institutional actions. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By raising concerns about media transparency, it aims to contribute to public discourse on election integrity. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.