In reply to:
The statement engages with a public issue by addressing the spread of misinformation about the trans community, as highlighted in the Rolling Stone article. The tone is inquisitive, seeking clarification or evidence regarding the alleged lies mentioned in the article.
- The statement does not cause harm and seeks clarification, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- By asking for clarification, the statement could promote understanding and empathy, as it encourages a fact-based discussion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by asking for evidence rather than making personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech by responsibly questioning the content of the article. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.