Jill Stien

Rank 25 of 47
|
Score 31

The statement critiques the Democratic Party's compromises on various policy issues, suggesting that these compromises have led to significant negative consequences, including loss of life. It advocates for the creation of a third political party with strong, unwavering principles.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses strong language to criticize the Democratic Party, which could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, but it does not directly incite harm. [-1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on blame and criticism rather than constructive dialogue. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks but rather criticizes a political party's actions. However, it lacks constructive criticism and dialogue. [-1]
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to advocate for political change, which could be seen as an attempt to influence society positively. [+1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech by critiquing political actions and advocating for a new political party, but it could be more responsible by fostering constructive dialogue.