The statement engages in public discourse by addressing concerns about censorship and the removal of certain terms from use at UT-Austin. It questions the extent of the restrictions and references a broader conversation about free speech and diversity initiatives.
- The statement does not directly harm but questions the actions of an institution, which can be seen as a form of critique.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy and dignity, focusing on institutional actions rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement invites dialogue by questioning the extent of the ban, which can lead to constructive discussion. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By questioning institutional actions, it uses influence to potentially highlight issues of public concern. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- It upholds free speech by questioning potential censorship, aligning with principles of open dialogue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.