Reposted by Bret Baier
-1
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the topic of bipartisanship in the U.S. Senate, specifically referencing the filibuster as a tool that necessitates bipartisan cooperation. It comments on a political process and reflects on the dynamics of legislative decision-making.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as sarcastic, which might not foster a positive dialogue.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it uses a sarcastic tone rather than a constructive one. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but uses sarcasm, which may not contribute to constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to comment on a public issue, though the tone could be more constructive. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.