Matt Taibbi

The statement critiques President Biden's decision to approve the use of ATACMS against Russia, suggesting it endangers national security, troop safety, and violates the U.S. Constitution. It engages in public discourse by addressing significant public issues related to national security, military actions, and constitutional law.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not directly harm with words but implies potential harm from the President's actions.
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement respects privacy and dignity, focusing on policy critique rather than personal attacks. [+1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is primarily critical. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in criticism but does not provide constructive dialogue or solutions. [-1]
5. Principle 5:

   I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.

   There is no acknowledgment of potential mistakes in the statement itself.
6. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement uses influence to critique a policy decision, which can be seen as an attempt to better society by holding leaders accountable. [+1]
7. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement exercises free speech responsibly by addressing a public issue, though it could be more balanced. [+1]