Bret Baier

The statement appears to engage with public issues by discussing a proposed plan involving public figures and government regulations, which could impact public policy and governance. The tone is somewhat speculative and informal, using emojis and quotes to convey skepticism or uncertainty about the plan's details.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as promoting a controversial or unclear plan without thorough analysis.
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   There is no direct disrespect or harassment, but the informal tone might not fully respect the seriousness of the topic.
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not actively promote understanding or empathy, as it lacks detailed explanation or context. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in personal attacks but does not offer constructive criticism or dialogue either.
5. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement does not clearly use influence for societal betterment, as it presents a plan without critical evaluation. [-1]
6. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement uses free speech but could be more responsible by providing clearer context and analysis. [-1]