Jill Stien

Rank 27 of 47
|
Score 44

The statement is a critical commentary on the ongoing conflict involving Ukraine, NATO, and the United States, expressing a strong opinion on the actions of NATO and the U.S. government. It suggests that NATO provoked the war and criticizes the U.S. for escalating the situation, calling for an end to the conflict to prevent further catastrophe.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses strong language that could be seen as inflammatory, potentially causing harm by escalating tensions or spreading fear, thus not fully adhering to the principle of doing no harm. [-1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on assigning blame and predicting catastrophic outcomes without offering solutions or fostering dialogue. [-2]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it uses charged language and does not invite discussion or consider alternative perspectives. [-2]
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to influence public opinion on a significant issue, but it does so in a manner that may not contribute positively to societal betterment due to its alarmist tone. [-1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech but may not use the platform responsibly, as it could incite fear or misunderstanding without providing a balanced view. [-1]