In reply to:
The statement engages in public discourse by contributing to a debate on the public health issue of water fluoridation. It presents scientific studies to support a position on the potential risks of fluoride, thus participating in a civic dialogue about public health policy.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, as it presents scientific studies to inform the discussion.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement attempts to promote understanding by referencing scientific studies, which can foster informed debate. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by providing evidence to support its position, without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to discuss a public health issue, which aligns with the responsible use of free speech. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.