Globe Eye News
@GlobeEyeNews
·
34d
The statement expresses a strong opinion on the actions of US officials regarding an international legal matter involving a political figure. It uses charged language, referring to the individual as a 'monster,' which indicates a negative tone and intent to criticize both the individual and the US response.
- The statement uses inflammatory language, which could be seen as harmful, reducing its adherence to the principle of doing no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of the individual it criticizes, violating the principle of respecting privacy and dignity. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue and instead uses personal attacks, violating the principle of constructive criticism. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.