Jill Stien

The statement critiques U.S. military spending and its impact on global conflicts, specifically mentioning Gaza. It uses strong language, such as 'genocidal war,' to emphasize its point.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement aims to highlight perceived harm caused by U.S. military actions, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm. [+1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The use of strong language could be seen as disrespectful or inflammatory, potentially violating the principle of respecting dignity. [-1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement seeks to promote understanding of military spending's impact, aligning with promoting empathy and compassion. [+1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in criticism of U.S. policies, which is constructive but could be seen as harsh, potentially bordering on personal attacks.