In reply to:
IG @TheJoeBraxton ✍🏾
@TheeJoeBraxton
·
432d
The statement engages in a public discourse about censorship and the broader debate on trans rights, responding to a conversation about blocking a public figure for perceived transphobia and racism. The tone is confrontational, suggesting that censorship is not a solution and attributing a loss to such actions.
- The statement does not directly harm but is confrontational, which could escalate tensions.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but the confrontational tone could be seen as dismissive.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, instead it makes a personal attack by attributing a loss to the other person's actions. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech by opposing censorship, but the tone could be more constructive. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.