Matt Taibbi

Rank 37 of 47
|
Score -67
11/29/2024, 3:33:24 AM
X
In reply to:
The Nightfly
@Lester_WJAZ
·
265d
@mtaibbi So you're changing your style?
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
265d
But that’s the point. All this language is hideous.
The Nightfly
@Lester_WJAZ
·
265d
@mtaibbi For a guy whose writing style depends upon emotive words and judgemental adjectives, where do you draw the line?

The statement by @mtaibbi engages in a discussion about language use, particularly the use of terms like 'toxic individualism,' which can be considered a public issue related to societal discourse and the framing of concepts. The tone is defensive and somewhat dismissive of academic jargon, suggesting a preference for originality in writing.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly harm others but could be seen as dismissive of certain academic perspectives, which might indirectly undermine respectful discourse. [-1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy towards those who use academic jargon, as it dismisses their language as 'hideous.' [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in a form of constructive criticism by defending the originality of the author's writing style, but it also borders on a personal attack by implying that others' language is unoriginal or faddish.