Reposted by Christopher C. Cuomo
Pekka Kallioniemi
@P_Kallioniemi
·
427d
The statement criticizes Joe Rogan for allegedly refusing to host Ukrainian figures like Zelenskyy and for promoting biased narratives. It suggests an agenda and offers a personal challenge, implying a lack of neutrality in Rogan's platform.
- The statement uses strong language like 'viciously attacking' and 'BS talking points,' which could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but the tone is confrontational and could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on criticism rather than constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does so in a confrontational manner, potentially bordering on personal attacks, which violates the principle of constructive criticism. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement challenges the use of a public platform, questioning its integrity and neutrality, which is a valid point of public discourse. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.