Holden Caulfield
@LatexSalesman20
·
430d
The statement engages in a political discussion about truthfulness and accountability in leadership, specifically addressing the actions of a public figure. It critiques perceived dishonesty and questions the integrity of those who support such figures.
- The statement uses derogatory language ('stupid') which could be seen as harmful and dismissive, violating the principle of doing no harm with words. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it does make a broad accusation against a group of people ('you voted for a liar'), which could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it includes a personal attack ('you voted for a liar') rather than focusing on the issue at hand. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.